Hidden

Before I even started this blog, I wrote a few pieces for an online publication called catapult. The thoughtful themes and diversity of voices was an appealing place to begin writing for a broader audience.

Topology is a brand new magazine from the folks who used to put out catapult and they are running a few “throwback” pieces from the old magazine this fall.

This month they are featuring a piece I wrote in 2013 about living on the margins as a family dealing with autism. I hope you’ll click over and take a look.

Who Wants to Pray?

People in my profession get asked to pray a lot.  Many times, there isn’t even any asking going on – it’s simply assumed the pastor is the one who prays.  When one of us pastor types goes off script and cheerfully offers for one of the other Christians in the group to have the honor, uncomfortable silence ensues.  “Who feels called to offer a blessing for this meal?”   Crickets.

photo

I can’t blame the non-pastor types.  It can be intimidating to be The One who announces through prayer – through what gets prayed for and what does not – where our collective focus lies and where we especially hope for the signs and wonders of God’s presence.  Since, in many faith communities, pastors are the only ones who ever have the opportunity to pray, it can send the message that you need special training or voice intonation or secret knowledge about the “right” things to say.

A couple of weekends ago I got to be one of the listeners as a group prayed together.  We took my stepson to a wonderful surf camp offered by Surfer’s Healing.  I’ve written about them before and the overwhelming nature of standing on a beach together watching our children go out to sea without us.  This year I was teary and moved again.  I found myself standing at the shoreline with gripped hands at my chest – almost in a prayer position – holding my breath, watching him work on trusting the surfers enough to go where they led.

It was breathtaking and comforting again to move through this “one perfect day” together, rehearsing the hard letting go of parents.  But what struck me this time was the ritual of beginning the day.

Once the surfboards are unpacked and lined up at the shore, the beach area roped off, and the registration tables up and running, the event organizers gather everyone.  Logistical announcements and thank you’s are issued and then Izzy Paskowitz, the founder of Surfer’s Healing (along with his wife, Danielle), says a few words.

He and the other surfers all wear wetsuits and stand together in a line at the front of the gathering.  Izzy talks about the “club none of us wanted to be in” as parents of autistic children and he talks about the generosity of sponsors and volunteers.  Then he calls on one of the other surfers to come offer the first of several prayers before embarking on the day.  We hear a prayer in English then a second surfer takes the mic and offers one in Spanish.  Then a third surfer comes forward and sings a traditional Hawaiian prayer to the tune of the doxology.

When we first got to the beach I saw the surfers in wetsuits and felt some competing combination of being a geeky teenager around the cool kids and being an old mom.  Each of them is young, many are tattooed, and they look sleek and muscular in their second skins.  If I let my own high school experiences or movies clichés take over my thinking, they appear to me as a group of untouchably cool dudes.

But I look at them as we are praying.  Every last one of them is holding hands with the surfers next to him, heads bowed.  No one looks impatient, bored, or uncomfortable.  I don’t get the feeling from any of them or from the crowd at large that this part of the day is imposed or strange or old-fashioned or constricting.

They do this every day of camp all season long.  Before heading into rough waters with autistic children they’ve never seen before this moment, they pause and pray.  As they gather their strength, stamina, patience, and hopes for a rough and rewarding day, they recognize their intentions and ask for God’s blessings on the camp.  There was nothing showy about any of the prayers or the fact of praying together before beginning.  I only consciously understood the words of the English prayer but I’ll go out on a limb and say none of the prayers were self-conscious or full of buzzwords.  They were simple, short, in and of the moment, heartfelt.

I was completely taken aback and had to wipe tears from my eyes during the prayers.  The sight of the cool dudes, long hair flying in the wind, holding hands and praying on the beach got me choked up.  It was the opposite of what many of us experience in church – or what we are afraid will happen when we pray together in church, especially if one of the “non-professionals” offers the prayer.

That day on the beach, I began wondering about how we are teaching people to pray in context.  For those of us who are asked/assumed to pray, how can we model praying so it’s an invitation to others to do the same?  It seems to me that many times in the church we gather to offer prayers and ask God’s blessings on a meal or a service trip but our humility is hidden under slick phrasing or a tone-of-voice assumption that the prayer is a “lock on it” rather than the start of it.

What I experienced on the beach was a group of consummate professionals vulnerable enough to hold hands and remember the One who makes all days gifts.  How can we professional pray-ers model this spirit and invite the non-professionals to the mic?  What would this look like at tax time in an accountant’s office?  In a writer’s room?  Before surgery in an operating room?

I need to hear more prayers from the trenches, raised up from wherever by whomever, stating the simple but obvious truth and need of our lives.  This matters and we give it to you – the success and the difficulty of it – and ask your blessing.  We know you’re here.  Thank God.

 

Fence-sitting and Pastoral Boundaries

Our church is fighting in public.  Again.  This month – this week in particular – it’s a church trial in Pennsylvania.  Rev. Frank Schaefer is on trial for officiating at the wedding of his son, who is gay.  public domain image_black and white picture of throngs of Dartmouth students sitting on a fence

Currently our United Methodist Book of Discipline, in a feat of fence-sitting “balance,” considers every human regardless of sexuality to be an individual of “sacred worth” but maintains that homosexuality is “incompatible with Christian teaching.”  We do not allow people to be clergy if they are “self-avowed practicing homosexuals” but we hold fast to (most) civil rights for LGBT people and unequivocally condemn violence against them . Our churches are not permitted to host weddings for same-sex couples, neither are our pastors permitted to officiate at these weddings. 

It’s an uncomfortable fence and we have been straddling it for a while.

The basic details in the Schaefer trial are this:  His son asked him to officiate at his wedding and Schaefer agreed.  The pastor told his district superintendent but not his congregation.  Life and ministry went on.  Over 5 years later – in the month when the statute of limitations would have expired for this “offense” – a member of Schaefer’s church filed a complaint.  The member, Jon Boger, was by this point living in another state and not involved in any church congregation but his membership was still on record at Schaefer’s church.  Boger’s mother worked at the church and had recently been fired.

Many have noticed the unusual timing of Boger’s complaint (many years after the wedding but just in time to cause trouble) and his own anger and presumed retaliation over his mother’s job loss.  It certainly explains a lot. 

Unfortunately, it doesn’t explain why we went ahead with a trial clearly forged out of anger and vengeance but that just happened to have an actual complaint wrapped up in the middle.  If the Council of Bishops has “discretion as the chief pastors of the church over the manner, purpose, and conduct of any supervisory response and just resolution under ‘fair process’” then they have missed a golden opportunity to exercise that discretion – especially given the retaliatory nature of the so-called complaint.  To make it even plainer:  If Boger had expressed his true complaint (i.e.,” You fired my mom!”) and this wouldn’t have gone to trial, why did it proceed?  A genuinely contentious and heartbreaking issue has been hijacked to serve another purpose and the Council sat by while it played out.

Something else bothering me throughout conversations about this trial is the well-meaning but theologically insubstantial point that Schaefer did this wedding for his own son.  This line of reasoning seems to posit that since it was a family matter, charges, punishments, and what’s at state theologically and pastorally are different.  Indeed, Schaefer may be speaking in a mixed way about both his duty as a father and his duty as a pastor – and who could blame him?

But for those of us observing and praying and talking about this from a few steps back, I find it dangerous to talk about pastoral-priestly actions clergy take within their own families as somehow separate from their vocation and ordination “to the rest of us.”  I am a pastor all the time but it is dangerous to think of myself as a pastor to my husband, for example.  That is not my role in that relationship.  This doesn’t mean we never officiate at funerals or weddings or baptisms within our own families, but it does require greater clarity on the part of the pastor as to her motivations and role in those moments. 

In the terms I hear Jesus using (“Woman here is your son”; “Who is my mother, and who are my brothers?”), he more often points us outside of our intimate and familial circles to those unrelated by blood, even those we don’t yet know or like or understand.  In theological terms, “he was doing it for his own son” seems to hold less water than “he did it for a church member” or “he did it for a person from the neighborhood who he didn’t know previously.” 

I say this not to diminish Schaefer’s actions but to ask all of us to consider the terrain more closely.  The argument that the church should go easy on him because he “just” did this for his son is a weak argument and not theologically sound.  The body of Christ forms us into a new family, creating brothers and sisters where before there were strangers.  The body of Christ does not call us to close ranks and minister to those closest to us but rather to extend the good news of Christ’s gospel to people and places where we are uncomfortable, challenged, or even afraid to go.

It seems clear to me Schaefer was acting both as a loving father and a minister of the gospel when he agreed to officiate at his son’s wedding.  He has said, “I did not want to make this a protest about the doctrine of the church. I wasn’t trying to be an advocate.  I just wanted this to be a beautiful family affair, and it was that.”  His ongoing concern for where his congregation is on these issues, even as he sought to minister to his son and respond to the call of the gospel, strikes me as pastoral (not cowardly or culpable as Boger and others might imply).  Schaefer has also said, “I love the United Methodist Church. I’ve been a minister for almost 20 years and there are so many good things about the United Methodist Church except for that one rule.” 

I support what Schaefer did, along with the actions of Bishops Swenson and Talbert and the group effort of solidarity earlier this month elsewhere in Pennsylvania.  I want our church to get off the fence and I want us to match our actions and our Discipline to the radically inclusive and norm-breaking love of Christ.  Of course, I want us to get off the fence in one particular direction:  full inclusion of all people in the full life of the church. 

I have no idea if this will happen or when.  But I write about it and I pray for it.  And I pray we United Methodists will remember both Jesus and John Wesley, who said, “As to all opinions which do not strike at the root of Christianity, we think and let think.”  The sexuality issues we are fighting about are not at the root of Christianity.  But to refuse full inclusion in the body of Christ to our brothers and sisters chops right into the root and threatens to sever it.  It’s a refusal to see Jesus for who he is (Matthew 25: 31-46).

*

photo credit:  public domain

Halloween. Boo.

smiling jack o lantern with lit candle

I considered doing something anti-community this week.  Rather, I considered not doing something.  I was seriously thinking about keeping the lights off and not buying any candy and stopping by a bar for a while on the way home tomorrow night.  I was going to skip the whole trick-or-treating thing.

I have my reasons.  Our house is up a steep hill and I have actually stood at the door on previous Halloween evenings while filling little buckets with candy and heard other children down at the bottom of the driveway say It’s not worth it when they see the climb.  We also don’t want the temptation of the candy in the house, even for one night.  I don’t believe in giving crappy candy so we get the good stuff – Reese’s, Snickers, York Peppermints, Twix – things I will eat when they are just sitting there and I have to keep expending all that energy to get up and walk to the door with the huge bowl of them.  Also, I work on Thursday nights and won’t get home until it’s almost over, so why bother?

Aren’t they good reasons?

We don’t have small children and we don’t know many of those in our neighborhood.  It would be so easy to just opt out.  It’s not up to us.  We’ve done our time on that circuit.  Even though I’ll spend time Facebook-liking the many pictures of my friends’ kids in their costumes in faraway cities, who wants to keep interrupting the World Series or Parks and Recreation for all these unknown neighborhood kids?  Some of the older ones seem to think they’re doing me a favor as they jut out their pillowcase-bags while checking their phones and avoiding eye contact. 

That’s the temptation.  It’s not the candy’s siren call.  It’s the allure of proclaiming ourselves done, moved on, past all that.  It’s the easy answer thinking:  But I don’t even know them or It’s not like when we were kids.  The thing is, it probably isn’t like it was when we were kids.  I really did know many more of my neighbors then than I do now – I even knew the ones who were old and retired or who didn’t have kids.  It was a different time.  But I suspect this wasn’t different:  Those families I knew then didn’t want to keep getting up to answer the door either.  They had also worked long days.  They were tired and didn’t really care if I was dressed as a Gypsy – again.  But they stocked up on candy and turned the lights on and answered the door and were appropriately impressed with my scarves.

Community requires participation.  Not knowing the neighbors is not an excuse to keep not knowing them, especially while lamenting the way it used to be.  It’s a call to try harder – or just plain try.  I may be far from my Goddaughter and the other cute children whose pictures I’ll peruse, but these are the kids right in front of me and they want some candy and attention.  Maybe that’s all it will be but they deserve at least this modicum of engagement by the adults in their neighborhood.   

The lights will be on at our house Thursday.  The good candy will be in the bowl by the door and I may even holler down the hill to encourage the kids to make the trek up.  It is, quite honestly, the least I can do.  It’s better than nothing and it’s better than being the dark house with the old people who don’t like kids.  Boo to that.

*

photo credit:  “Friendly Pumpkin,” © 2009 Anders Lagerås, CC BY-SA 3.0

Epiphany on the Shore

When I got married at 40 I also became stepmom to a 19 year-old with autism.  By the time we became a family, I had finally started feeling proud of my single self for putting some money into my retirement account each month.  That’s where I was with planning for the future – and I thought it was pretty good, all things considered.  Then I became one of the autism parenting team. 

In the time I’ve been his stepmom, he has graduated from the school he attended and – as with many times before – paved the way for those behind him, this time as one of the first in the fledgling adult day care program.  It’s a wonderful program and he’s contented there. 

surfers healing at va beach

Click the picture for a great short video about Surfers Healing.

And we still don’t know what’s next.  I spend more time than I probably should worried about it.  My meager retirement-savings-for-one – even when coupled with my husband’s – are even more meager when expected to last another lifetime for someone who will never work or live on his own.  And that’s just the money.  I also worry about how and where he will live and who will take care of him.

I’ve known for a while now the worry is not good and does no good.  But it’s hard to stop. 

Then we went to the beach for the day.

We had one of those coveted spots at a Surfers Healing camp this summer.  Surfers Healing is a non-profit founded by Izzy and Danielle Paskowitz after discovering the calming effects of surfing on their son who has autism.  A former competitive surfer, Izzy recruits other pro surfers to take children – hundreds at each camp – surfing.  They are expert surfers and amazing people who interact so beautifully with the kids and adults with autism. 

My stepson loves the beach so he didn’t take any convincing to go.  I wasn’t sure what his reaction to surfing would be, though we rehearsed the story with him the whole day before and on the long ride there.  He can swim and they put everyone in life jackets before they get anywhere near the ocean’s edge.  So I wasn’t worried about him.  I was happy we could take the time and make the trip.  I wanted him to have the experience and I thought he’d be the one gaining healing and calm that day.  The only one.

I was wrong.

The surfers walked with him down to the shoreline and demonstrated how to lay stomach-down on the board.  Three of them steadied the surf board and accompanied him out to sea.  As they bobbed their way out, away from us, I was overcome with emotion and tears.  I was not expecting this.  I stood there in the wind, watching these kind surfers take him some place I couldn’t go and yet I knew he was still completely safe.

It was relief I felt.  And it flooded me with tears.  Standing there, I felt the weight of the worry I have been carrying since I came into his life.  I recognized my biggest worry by far is who will take care of him after we are all gone. 

I know it won’t be those surfers we met that day.  But the gift of watching them surround him on the board and go with him into the waves was the gut-level certainty that someone could and would.  It was like a trial run, handing him over to others who can take care of him and handle his quirks and his beauty.  It was the most unexpected gift and relief-drenched glimpse of what can come next.

I didn’t go to the beach for my own healing that day.  I never even got in the water, but I’m ready to go back next year and stand on the shore again.  Rehearse the relief.  Receive the gift of community.  Allow healing.  Look ahead into the choppy waters with hope.

Break Free

Here’s what I want for Mother’s Day:  I want the church to break out of its bondage.  I want us to stop our incremental “improvement” about how we speak and act in worship on Mother’s Day and claim a real holy-day instead.

canadian rockies

Jessica Miller Kelley’s article at Ministry Matters earlier this week included some helpful and sensitive advice for making it through this Sunday’s worship without stepping on some of the biggest landmines.  I appreciate her inclusion of the wide spectrum of mothering and her sincere effort to include mothers who may come to church on Sunday expecting the “traditional” celebration, while not excluding women who are dreading the day.  But in her effort to include all sorts of women with all sorts of reproductive experiences, she effectively simplifies women’s experience.  (And, though I’m sure it wasn’t her choice to use the photo, the accompanying picture of a mother and her baby didn’t help expand the topic.)

 I finished her article thinking, It’s not all about (in)fertility.  Mother’s Day is not only uncomfortable because some of us are unsettled or unhappy about our circumstances, whatever they may be.  Mother’s Day is uncomfortable – especially in church – because it defines womanhood as motherhood.  Yes, it can be difficult to be a woman who has not borne children or one who has miscarried or one who cannot have children.  But it is not all about (in)fertility issues.  It is not all about having or longing for children. 

At the most basic level, this is still a painful day because our culture and our church are still having the same conversation we were having 50 years ago:  Can women “have it all”?  When and how does a woman decide to be a mother?  How should she prioritize or find balance between work and family life?  And we are still not asking these questions about men.  Notice that we don’t fret when Father’s Day is coming up.  Notice that we don’t make serious, expectation-filled mention of men when we talk about women having it all.  The onus is still on women to make the accommodations, to make it all work – or to stop working or to settle for being a “sub-par” mother.

The focus of our conversation on children or lack thereof simplifies and pokes at something potentially painful, and reduces the conversation back to our biological role.  The focus on Mother’s Day in church is then like a spotlight aimed right on each of us women, all eyes on us, waiting for a performance we are not interested in giving on this narrow stage of expectation.  The lines are prescribed and rehearsed and there isn’t really room for new plotlines.  These are complicated issues and merely trying to avoid offending people, or worse, trying to name and include every reproductive experience possible, are both inadequate.   

So I want the church to break free and to stop worrying over how to “do” Mother’s Day right in worship.  I want a new conversation and a renewed focus.

I want us to remember our baptismal calling, that we are a family formed by God’s call.  I want us to remember what we vow when one of our young ones is baptized, that all of us together as the body of Christ have responsibility for raising children in the faith.  Sure, mothers of all sorts would continue to be lifted up as disciples who take on a special measure of this calling.  But so would teachers, Sunday school teachers, police officers, fathers, social workers, artists – all men and women.  Wouldn’t that be an interesting, theologically sound, give-us-a-reason-to-be-in-church way to observe this day and make it holy? 

Charlie Rose has Never Changed a Diaper

thyme growing on kitchen window ledge

Well, you didn’t think I would have a picture of that, did you?

I was drinking coffee, enjoying the leisurely wake-up of a day off, and watching CBS This Morning when I heard it.  Gayle King mentioned changing babies’ diapers and turned aside to ask Charlie Rose if he had ever changed a diaper.  He answered “no.”  I stopped drinking coffee.  I think I repeated it aloud.  I was astonished.   Charlie Rose is 71 years old and he has never changed a diaper?

I know he doesn’t have kids.  But how does a human being make it to 71 without this most basic act of care for another human being?  I suspect girls still babysit more than boys do, and so, get more practice in this skill before they ever might have children of their own.  I think King’s comment was meant, in part, to highlight the fact that women engage in this sort of domestic task more often than men, even in 2013.  But still.

I am not trying to disparage Rose himself.  I like him and have eagerly followed his work on multiple networks and shows.  But the fact of this simply astounds me.  I have not raised a child from infancy but I have changed diapers since I was in elementary school.  Visiting friends and family, babysitting, family reunions, giving a tired parent an extra hand.  I think of these as normal in-the-course-of-things moments when the possibility of changing a diaper can present itself.  I think of myself as one of the people who can help with this when needed.  I absolutely cannot imagine either never finding myself in this position or opting out of the line-up.

Let it be said, I have opted out.  I have on many occasions thought to myself I know they are tired but that is a particularly smelly one and I’m going to let his parents handle it.  But those have been momentary choices rather than a permanent status.

On CBS This Morning King joked that she and the third co-host, Norah O’Donnell, both mothers, had changed a lot of diapers:  “We don’t mind poop.”  There is a liberating matter-of-factness about dealing with someone else’s body so intimately.  Routinely changing diapers for another person can raise the bar on what you consider “gross” but it can also be a peculiar blessing.  I think this is the part that startles and saddens me when I consider Charlie Rose.  What is it like to be 71 and have lived that apart?

To be sure, I have no idea about the contours of Rose’s life and he is mostly serving as my muse today.  He could have had other experiences providing a similar connection.  I had the privilege of being with my grandfather as he died.  I also helped a friend as she gave birth to her daughter.  In addition to the diaper-changing, I have tended to others’ bodies in these intimate ways, caring for them when they needed things they could not do for themselves.  In both instances I knew I was on holy ground.  Maybe Rose has stood there, too.

My husband astutely reminds me that, besides the gender difference in cultural expectations for nurture and care, there is also the cultural fear of unrelated men caring for children in such intimate ways.  That is a fair point and one that certainly can explain the lack of opportunity for men to join in and lend a hand.  But it is sad.  For all the warranted suspicion and fear, this prevailing cultural stance also excludes and limits perfectly upstanding men from participating in some of the most important, human work in life.

So this morning’s revelation has me wondering.  We are accustomed to thinking about certain markers or milestones in life:  graduation, marriage, children, buying a home.  But what are the other markers?  What are the markers of connection and humanity that really matter?  Assisting at someone’s death or birth? Bathing and feeding a child?  Sitting with someone while they wait for treatment in the hospital?  Baking a cake for someone’s birthday?

I don’t know what goes on my list, except diaper-changing.  But I am thinking about it.  And I am giving thanks today for the real, tangible, necessary, messy, and beautiful ways I have been blessed with caring for other people.  What goes on your list?  When you are 71 (or 101), how will you know when you’ve lived a full life? 

Yielding

(This was originally published in the 4/8/11 issue of catapult magazine.)

When Lisa told me she was learning to yield it was the most honest description of becoming a parent I had ever heard.  She was a new mother and we were sitting in her study, books everywhere, windows overlooking the yard, glass doors to close when needed.  It was nap time and we were there with the doors open, in case her son woke up.  We spoke quietly about how she was making way in her life and how she still craved thoughtful solitary times, even as she learned to yield to the new contours of her calling as a mother.

I understood something about yielding then.  I was finally answering God’s persistent call for me, making my way towards ordination after a roundabout and wandering journey.  The unsettled acceptance Lisa described seemed familiar and I hoped to remember her experience when I had children.

A few years later, the year I turned 40, I married the love of my life.  In a garden with geese honking as they flew by overhead, we were married and I became the stepmother of an 18-year-old with autism.  Absolutely perfect — and not at all how or when I thought marriage and motherhood would happen in my life.

A year and a half into our marriage we decided not to have a baby.  I was 42 and Woody was 54.  Blair was 20.  I knew about the tendency of autism to run in families and the increased likelihood of older parents to have a child with autism.  We already had concerns about managing Blair’s lifelong care and we knew autism isn’t the only concern for parents our age.  One day, with strange and sudden clarity I said to myself, “I have no business trying to get pregnant.”  Then I said it to my husband and cried.

I still wanted it.  I still want it, sometimes more than others.  My next door neighbors’ darling girls, the adorable Lily on Modern Family, and my own Goddaughter awaken a deep and still-present urge to have a baby with Woody, to raise a child from birth, to mother a girl.

But for me it has ended up not to be entirely about wanting.  Though I experienced a moment of clarity and made a decision, I am uncomfortable saying, “We decided not to have children.”  It felt less like a decision and more like yielding.  Yielding is about recognition, somehow, like turning around a bend to see familiar terrain or looking up from a book and into the face of your beloved.  There you are and you acquiesce to keep going in that direction.

Woody talks about an earlier time in Blair’s life with autism when he realized that his own parental expectations and goals had changed.  He relaxed his grip and focused his attention on stewarding Blair’s happiness and health.  My own yielding has something to do with stewardship, with recognizing old scripts about life for what they are, while also recognizing in deep appreciation where I have actually ended up.  These are the people – the family – I’ve been given so much later than I thought they would arrive and almost past the point when I thought it still possible.  This is the familiar terrain I’ve been given, the gift of right here.

Right here in our life together how do we practice stewardship?  What is the best and most faithful way we can steward – put to use for God – our life, time, love, and money?  Here is the child given into our care and he’s enough.  Being faithful stewards of Blair’s well-being is enough – a hard, joyful calling we are blessed to inhabit.

Six months to the day after our wedding, I led a trip to Israel-Palestine with my congregation.  My still-new husband stayed home and I felt the absence of my family.  Perusing a gift shop in Nazareth I found an icon of the holy family, three other unlikely people who were formed into family.  Earlier in my ministry I had anticipated the joy of being pregnant, preaching, and presiding at Table during Advent, my story comingling with Mary’s.  In Nazareth just after Christmas Joseph became my new companion.  Joseph, the one not related by blood but the final link that forms the family.

I was caught off guard just last week:  “Did you ever have a baby?” and “Do you and your husband want to have children?”  Sometimes, at times like that, I feel more unsettled than accepting.  I know people are curious and unaware of how deep the answers go to those questions.  And, depending on whether it’s one of my 18-year-old parishioners or someone with a few more years on her, I can struggle with how much and which parts to give in answer.  More painful are statements like “She put off a family for her career,” in their obstinate or ignorant insistence on only one set of choices about the path through life.  A or B.  But, as it turns out, there are more paths than can be conceived.  Some you choose, others choose you.

I would have chosen to be Mary but Joseph’s role chose me instead.  I became a mother by marriage and by the grace of God.